Media Room
January 27th, 2012
The Globe and Mail -- Gateway panel urged to affirm it’s impartial
,January 27th, 2012
Excerpted from The Globe and Mail:
As the federal government prepares to make major changes to the way Canada reviews industrial projects, environmentalists are challenging the panel assessing the Northern Gateway pipeline to prove it’s not biased.
Over the past few weeks, federal ministers have carried out a high-profile dispute with environmental groups, some of which have been labelled “radicals.” Prime Minister Stephen Harper has said he is working quickly to bring forward new rules creating more rapid review processes that can’t be “hijacked” by such groups. He has warned about “foreigners” gumming up regulatory processes. The clear inference was to the Gateway review.
Now, Ecojustice, a legal group representing environmental advocates, is questioning whether that political pressure is affecting the ability of the three-person joint federal review panel to properly assess Gateway, a $6.6-billion project that would carry Alberta crude to the West Coast for export to Asia and California.
In a motion filed Friday, Ecojustice asks the panel to determine whether statements from Mr. Harper and Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver, “constitute an attempt by those ministers to undermine or have had the effect of undermining the panel” in a way that would create “unfairness in the hearing process.”
Ecojustice, which filed the motion on behalf of Living Oceans Society, Rainforest Conservation Foundation and ForestEthics, urges the panel to issue a statement confirming its independence.
It also wants the panel to urge the government to butt out, asking it to request “that ministers of the Crown refrain from further public comments on the proceedings of the panel and participants in the proceedings until the panel’s proceedings are concluded.”
[...] Mr. Page [Executive Director with Ecojustice] argued that calling environmental participants in the Gateway review “radicals” has affected their appearances before the panel. That alone, he said, begs for a response.
FAIR USE NOTICE. This document may contain copyrighted material whose
use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
ForestEthics is making this article available in our efforts to advance
the understanding of environmental and social issues. We believe that
this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,'
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
